MERCK TO PAY MORE THAN $915 MILLION TO SETTLE VIOXX CLAIMS WITH STATES AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

  
MERCK TO PAY MORE THAN $915 MILLION TO SETTLE VIOXX CLAIMS WITH STATES AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE :   Wednesday, November 23, 2011 
CONTACT: Sara Rabern, (605) 773-3215

MERCK TO PAY MORE THAN $915 MILLION TO SETTLE VIOXX CLAIMS WITH STATES AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


PIERRE, S.D.  -Attorney General Marty Jackley announced today that South Dakota has joined with 42 other states and the federal government and reached agreement with Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Merck) to settle civil and criminal allegations that Merck marketed its drug Vioxx for uses not approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), misrepresented the cardiovascular safety issues relating to the drug and otherwise made false and misleading representations about Vioxx. Merck will pay the states and the federal government a total of $615 million in civil damages and penalties to compensate Medicaid, Medicare and other federal healthcare programs for harm suffered as a result of this conduct. The total portion of the settlement amount recovered by South Dakota is over $1.5 million.
 
Vioxx (generic name rofecoxib) is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication that was approved by the FDA in 1999 for the treatment of osteoarthritis, acute pain conditions and dysmenorrhea. On September 30, 2004, Merck voluntarily withdrew Vioxx from the market worldwide, citing an increase in the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in patients taking Vioxx. An investigation initiated by the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts focused on allegations that Merck marketed Vioxx for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis before the FDA approved the drug for that usage, and that Merck promoted the cardiovascular safety of Vioxx by means of certain statements and writings that were inaccurate, misleading and inconsistent.  
 
South Dakota alleges that Merck made false representations concerning the safety of Vioxx to its Medicaid program and the Medicaid program relied on that information to its detriment in making formulary and prior authorization decisions with respect to the drug. South Dakota also alleges that Merck made false or misleading representations about Vioxx in its marketing, advertising and promotion of the drug that caused physicians to write prescriptions for Vioxx that they otherwise would not have written and thereby caused the Medicaid program to pay for prescriptions that should not have been reimbursed.
 
As a condition of the settlement, Merck will enter into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General, which will closely monitor the company’s future marketing and sales practices.
 
The South Dakota Medicaid Fraud Control Unit and the South Dakota Department of Social Services assisted in recovering the settlement money.
 
 
-30-