Attorney General Headshot

Attorney General Marty Jackley

Attorney General Seal

OFFICIAL OPINION NO. 75-69, Authority of conservancy subdistrict to call referendum

April 14, 1975

Mr. Vern W. Butler, Secretary
Department of 
Natural Resource Development 
Office Building
 Number 2
PierreSouth Dakota 57501

OFFICIAL OPINION NO. 75-69

Authority of conservancy subdistrict to call referendum

Dear Mr. Butler:

You have asked whether a conservancy subdistrict, established in accor­dance with chapter 46-18, has the authority to call a referendum on its ac­tions regarding the Oahe project.

The powers of the conservancy subdistricts are set out in chapter 46-18. These are the only powers that conservancy subdistricts have. SDCL 46-18-10 permits a referendum on the adjustment of subdistrict boundaries and on subdistrict dissolution. However, such adjustment or dissolution cannot affect long-term contractual obligations of the subdistrict. 1961-62 AGR 100, 101.

Before a subdistrict can enter into a contractual obligation, an election must be held. SDCL 46-18-37 to 38. With respect to the Oahe project, such an election was held in 1968. Furthermore, this procedure was reviewed by the circuit and supreme courts, In re Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict, 83 S.D. 443, 185 N.W. 2d 682 (197), pursuant to SDCL 46-18-39 and 46-18-39.1.

There is no provision for further review or referendum on this matter. Therefore, it is my opinion that a conservancy subdistrict does not have the authority to call a referendum on the Oahe project or any of its actions.

Respectfully submitted,

WILLIAM J. JANKLOW
ATTORNEY GENERAL

WJJ:MAG:rw